# Solar Panels on the Sides of the Seastead: Feasibility & Cost-Benefit Analysis
Can we harvest meaningful energy from the walls and foil legs? How much, at what cost, and is it worth it?
The three walls are flat surfaces. Each wall is tilted 60° from horizontal (equivalently, 30° from vertical) because the equilateral triangle's edges make a 60° angle with the horizontal plane of the deck. Each wall's outward-facing normal vector points outward and upward at 30° from vertical.
| Wall | Normal Azimuth (relative to forward) | Width | Height | Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left (Port) | +150° (forward-left) | 41.3 ft | 7 ft | 289 ft² |
| Right (Starboard) | −150° (forward-right) | 41.3 ft | 7 ft | 289 ft² |
| Back (Stern) | 180° (rearward) | 41.3 ft | 7 ft | 289 ft² |
Each foil leg is a symmetric airfoil standing vertically in the water. The upper half (~7.25 ft) is above the waterline. The curved outer surface of the foil is available for panels. The NACA 0030 profile has a maximum thickness of 2.55 ft (30% of the 8.5 ft chord). The surface of the foil curves inward from the leading edge (blunt, 2.55 ft wide) to the trailing edge (blunt after truncation, ~0.7 ft wide).
The wetted surface of the upper half of one foil leg is approximately 40 ft² (accounting for the curvature of the NACA 0030 profile). Three legs yield about 121 ft² total.
A fixed building on land has one south-facing wall (in the Northern Hemisphere) that gets good sun exposure; its other walls get much less. The seastead is fundamentally different: