Seastead Scale Model — Froude Scaling Analysis (1:10.5)
🌊 Seastead 1:10.5 Scale Model — Froude Scaling Analysis
Wave-tank testing preparation for Sandy Hill Bay, Anguilla
λ = 10.5√λ = 3.240λ³ = 1,157.6
1 Froude Scaling Overview
Froude scaling is the standard method for models where gravity and free-surface waves dominate — exactly the physics governing how a floating structure interacts with ocean waves. The central requirement is that the Froude number is equal in model and full scale:
Fr = V ⁄ √(g · L) → Frmodel = Frfull–scale
This means the ratio of inertial to gravitational forces is preserved. The trade-off is that the Reynolds number (viscous drag) will be lower on the model. For wave-response testing, gravity effects dominate, so this trade-off is acceptable.
🔑 Key Insight:Accelerations and angles are identical in model and full scale. A phone accelerometer mounted on the model reads the exact same g-forces the full-scale seastead would experience — no conversion needed!
2 Scale Model Dimensions (inches)
All dimensions computed as: Model = Full Scale ÷ 10.5
Main Triangle Frame (Living Area)
Dimension
Full Scale
Model (inches)
Model (cm)
Left side
70 ft
80.00″
203.2
Right side
70 ft
80.00″
203.2
Back (base)
35 ft
40.00″
101.6
Base-to-apex height of triangle
67.78 ft
77.46″
196.7
Truss height (floor → ceiling)
7 ft
8.00″
20.3
Enclosed floor area
1,186 sq ft
1,550 sq in
10,003 sq cm
Perimeter
175 ft
200.00″
508.0
Triangle Vertex Coordinates (model, inches, from centre of base)
Vertex
X (left–right)
Y (front–back)
Interior Angle
Back-Left
−20.00″
0.00″
75.5°
Back-Right
+20.00″
0.00″
75.5°
Front Apex
0.00″
+77.46″
29.0°
Buoyancy Legs / Foils (× 3)
Dimension
Full Scale
Model (inches)
Model (cm)
Vertical length
19 ft
21.71″
55.1
Chord (fore–aft)
10 ft
11.43″
29.0
Max thickness (NACA 0030 = 30 % of chord)
3 ft
3.43″
8.7
Cross-section area ≈ 0.686 × chord × thickness
20.6 sq ft
26.8 sq in
173 sq cm
Draft below waterline (50 %)
9.5 ft
10.86″
27.6
Freeboard above waterline (50 %)
9.5 ft
10.86″
27.6
Waterline-to-floor (freeboard + leg top)
9.5 ft
10.86″
27.6
Waterline-to-ceiling
16.5 ft
18.86″
47.9
RIM-Drive Thrusters (× 6)
Dimension
Full Scale
Model (inches)
Diameter
1.5 ft (18″)
1.71″
Position up from bottom of leg
3 ft
3.43″
Stabilisers — "Little Airplanes" (× 3)
Dimension
Full Scale
Model (inches)
Main wing span
12 ft
13.71″
Main wing chord
1.5 ft
1.71″
Fuselage length
6 ft
6.86″
Elevator span
2 ft
2.29″
Elevator chord
6 in
0.57″
Pivot at 25 % chord from leading edge
4.5 in
0.43″
Dinghy & Decks
Dimension
Full Scale
Model (inches)
RIB dinghy length
14 ft
16.00″
Side-deck width (extends past back)
5 ft
5.71″
3 Target Weight
Full-Scale Buoyancy Calculation
All buoyancy comes from the submerged halves of the three NACA 0030 legs.
Parameter
Value
NACA 0030 cross-section area (chord 10 ft)
20.6 sq ft
Submerged height per leg (50 % of 19 ft)
9.5 ft
Submerged volume per leg
195.2 cu ft
Total submerged volume (3 legs)
585.6 cu ft
Seawater density (Sandy Hill Bay)
64.0 lb / cu ft (1,025 kg/m³)
Full-scale displacement at 50 % draft
≈ 37,500 lbs (17.0 tonnes)
Model Target Weight
Model weight = 37,500 ÷ λ³ = 37,500 ÷ 1,157.6 ≈ 32.4 lbs (14.7 kg)
Practical target range: 30 – 35 lbs.
Ballast the model (lead shot, fishing sinkers, steel bolts) until each leg sits at 10.86″ draft in seawater.
Cross-check (model volumes):
Model leg X-section area: 20.6 ÷ 110.25 = 0.187 sq ft (26.9 sq in)
Model submerged height: 9.5 ÷ 10.5 = 0.905 ft (10.86 in)
Model submerged vol/leg: 0.187 × 0.905 = 0.169 cu ft
3 legs: 0.507 cu ft × 64 lb/ft³ = 32.4 lbs ✓
⚠️ Centre of Gravity: Make sure the model’s CG is positioned to match the full-scale design — vertically (low for stability) and longitudinally (centred so the waterline is even on all three legs). Adjust fore-and-aft ballast until the model floats level at the design waterline.
4 Wave Heights for Testing
Wave heights scale as length: Hmodel = Hfull ÷ λ
Full-Scale Significant Wave Height
Model Wave Height
Sea State (approx.)
3 ft (0.91 m)
3.43″ (8.7 cm)
Moderate seas
5 ft (1.52 m)
5.71″ (14.5 cm)
Rough seas
8 ft (2.44 m)
9.14″ (23.2 cm)
Very rough seas
📏 Measuring waves: Pound the graduated wooden pole into the sand near the model, clearly visible to the shore camera. Measure peak-to-trough height. Use the camera’s zoom to read the pole precisely, and time 10–20 wave crests with a stopwatch to get the average wave period.
Wave Period Scaling
Periods also scale by √λ: Tmodel = Tfull ÷ 3.24
Full-Scale Period
Model Period
Typical Wave Source
5 sec
1.54 sec
Short wind chop
6 sec
1.85 sec
Trade-wind waves
8 sec
2.47 sec
Mixed wind waves / swell
10 sec
3.09 sec
Medium Atlantic swell
12 sec
3.70 sec
Long Atlantic swell
Record the actual wave period at your test location — the bay will produce whatever nature provides. Use those real numbers when converting back to full-scale equivalents.
5 Time Scaling & Video Recording
Events in the model happen 3.24 × faster than at full scale. To make model video look “real time,” slow the playback by 3.24×.
Recommended Recording Frame Rates
Recording FPS
After 3.24× Slow-Down
Playback Quality
Verdict
30 fps
9.3 fps
⚠️ Choppy
Minimum usable
60 fps
18.5 fps
✓ Acceptable
Good baseline
120 fps
37 fps
✓ Smooth
⭐ Recommended
240 fps
74 fps
✓ Very smooth
Best for frame-by-frame analysis
✅ Recommendation: Record at 120 fps at 1080p — supported by most smartphones and all recent GoPros. After a 3.24× slow-down the video plays at a smooth 37 fps. If your phone supports 240 fps at 720p, use that for the GoPro POV camera.
Free-Decay Tests (Do These Too!)
Before wave testing, perform free-decay tests in calm water:
Heave decay: Push the model down and release. Film the vertical oscillation.
Roll decay: Tilt the model to one side and release.
Pitch decay: Push the bow down and release.
From the video, measure the natural period and decay rate (logarithmic decrement). The natural period at model scale ÷ 3.24 gives the full-scale natural period. These are fundamental design parameters.
Slow-Motion Software
DaVinci Resolve (free) — Optical-flow slow-motion; professional quality
Adobe Premiere Pro — Time-remapping with optical flow
Tracker (free) — Physics video analysis; can set frame rate and scale factor
6 Acceleration & Motion Metrics
🔑 Critical fact: In Froude scaling, accelerations are identical in model and full scale. A reading of 0.3 g on the model’s accelerometer means the full-scale seastead would also experience exactly 0.3 g. Angles (pitch, roll) are also identical.
Converting Measured Quantities to Full Scale
What You Measure on the Model
Conversion to Full Scale
Acceleration (heave, surge, sway) in g or m/s²
× 1 (same value)
Pitch & roll angles in degrees
× 1 (same value)
Heave displacement (inches)
× 10.5
Velocity (in/s or ft/s)
× 3.24
Roll / pitch rate (°/s)
÷ 3.24
Roll / pitch angular acceleration (°/s²)
÷ 10.5
Jerk (m/s³)
÷ 3.24
Mooring force (lbs)
× 1,158
Time duration (seconds)
× 3.24
Practical Acceleration Reference
Acceleration
Subjective Feel
Effect on Unsecured Objects (Full Scale)
0.05 g
Gentle
Water surface ripples slightly
0.10 g
Noticeable
Water in glass tilts ≈ 5.7°
0.20 g
Firm
Light objects on smooth surfaces begin to creep
0.30 g
Significant
Plates on tables begin to slide
0.50 g
Hard
Most unsecured items sliding; standing difficult
0.80 g
Severe
Must hold on; furniture shifting
1.00 g
Extreme
Capsizing / free-fall territory
7 Sliding-Plates Threshold
A plate (or any loose object) on a table starts sliding when the horizontal acceleration exceeds the friction coefficient × g:
aslide = μ × g
Surface
μ
Sliding Threshold
In g’s
Ceramic on varnished wood
0.2 – 0.3
6.4 – 9.7 ft/s²
0.2 – 0.3 g
Plate on laminate / formica
0.3 – 0.4
9.7 – 12.9 ft/s²
0.3 – 0.4 g
Glass on wet counter
0.1 – 0.2
3.2 – 6.4 ft/s²
0.1 – 0.2 g
Plate on rubber mat
0.5 – 0.8
16 – 26 ft/s²
0.5 – 0.8 g
✅ Because accelerations are identical at both scales: If your model phone reads 0.3 g horizontal, that’s exactly what a plate on a table would feel on the full-scale seastead. A plate with μ = 0.3 would begin to slide. No conversion needed — just read the number directly.
Other Useful Acceleration Metrics
Metric
What It Tells You
Model → Full Scale
Peak acceleration
Worst-case shock; correlates with injury / damage risk
× 1 (same)
RMS acceleration
Overall ride comfort (ISO 2631 standard)
× 1 (same)
Vibration dose value (VDV)
Cumulative comfort metric; accounts for duration
× 1 (same, for same real-time duration)
Spectral analysis (PSD)
Dominant frequencies of motion; identify resonances
Frequencies × 3.24 for full scale
Heave RAO (Response Amplitude Operator)
Ratio of heave amplitude to wave amplitude vs. frequency
Same (dimensionless)
8 Water-in-a-Cup Test
The “glass with rocks and water” is an excellent simple diagnostic! The water surface in the cup tilts in response to the model’s accelerations:
θtilt = arctan(ahorizontal ⁄ g)
Horizontal Acceleration
Water Tilt Angle
Full-Scale Condition
0.05 g
2.9°
Calm / gentle
0.10 g
5.7°
Comfortable
0.20 g
11.3°
Noticeable tipping
0.30 g
16.7°
Concerning
0.50 g
26.6°
Rough ride
🔑 The tilt angle in the model cup is the SAME as a cup on the full-scale seastead — because accelerations are identical. The sloshing happens 3.24× faster in the model; slowing your video by 3.24× makes the sloshing look realistic.
Tips for a Good Cup Test
Use a clear glass or plastic cup so the camera sees the water surface.
Don’t scale the cup down — a normal-sized cup (3–4″ diameter) on the model works great: it’s easy to see on camera, and surface-tension effects are negligible.
Fill to about 75 % — enough to see the tilt without immediate spilling.
Add a drop of food colouring for visibility.
Place a few rocks in the bottom so the cup doesn’t slide.
Put coloured tape marks on the outside at the still-water level for reference.
Place the cup at the centre of the living area (approximates a dining table).
The shore camera can measure the tilt angle directly from video frames.
9 Scale Dolls / Figures
Recommended doll height: 6.5 – 7.0 inches (16.5 – 17.8 cm)
Based on a 5′10″ (70″) adult: 70″ ÷ 10.5 = 6.67″
Figure Type
Typical Height
Scale Match
1:10 scale action figures (many brands)
6.5 – 7″
✅ Excellent
Marvel Legends / Star Wars Black Series
6 – 7″
✅ Great
GI Joe (classic 12″)
~12″
❌ Too tall (1:6)
Barbie / Ken
~11.5″
❌ Too tall (1:6)
Matchbox / Hot Wheels figures
~1.5–2″
❌ Too small
3D-printed custom (from free STL files)
Customisable
✅ Perfect if 6.67″
Suggestion: Search for “1:10 action figure” or “7-inch action figure.” Many affordable options exist. Place 2–3 figures inside the model for visual scale in both the shore camera and GoPro POV footage. Coloured clothing helps the figures stand out on video.
10 Water Depth & Deep-Water Waves
Deep-Water Wave Condition
A wave behaves as a “deep-water” wave when the water depth d exceeds half the wavelength:
d > λwave / 2 where λwave = (g ⁄ 2π) × T² ≈ 5.12 × T² (feet)
Wave Period (T)
Deep-Water Wavelength
Min. Depth for Deep Water
Feasible in Sandy Hill Bay?
2 sec
20.5 ft
10.3 ft
✅ Yes
3 sec
46.1 ft
23.0 ft
⚠️ Possibly (deeper spots)
4 sec
81.9 ft
41.0 ft
⚠️ Unlikely
6 sec
184 ft
92 ft
❌ Too shallow
8 sec
328 ft
164 ft
❌ Too shallow
10 sec
512 ft
256 ft
❌ Too shallow
⚠️ Reality for Sandy Hill Bay (est. 10–30 ft deep):
Short-period wind waves (T < 3 sec) — will be in deep or near-deep water. Good for testing.
Longer-period swell (T > 4 sec) — will be in transitional / shallow water. Waves will slow, steepen, and may break prematurely. Note this as a limitation.
Choose the deepest accessible spot in the bay — aim for 20+ feet.
Minimum depth for the model: At least 2–3 feet below the model’s legs so they don’t touch the bottom during heave excursions.
Practical Depth Rule of Thumb
Water depth ≥ 3 × the full-scale wave height prevents wave breaking at the test location:
3 ft waves → depth ≥ 9 ft
5 ft waves → depth ≥ 15 ft
8 ft waves → depth ≥ 24 ft
Measure the depth with a weighted line or depth sounder and record it in your test log.
What If the Bay Is Too Shallow for Long-Period Waves?
The test is still very valuable! You will learn about:
Static & dynamic stability in waves
Heave / pitch / roll natural frequencies and damping
Stabiliser effectiveness
Qualitative ride comfort (via cup test, GoPro POV)
Mooring loads
For deeper-water / longer-period validation, a wave tank at a naval-architecture lab would be the next step. The bay test gives you the critical first-pass data.
11 Camera & Recording Setup
📷 Shore Camera (Main)
Mount: Tripod on shore, elevated (higher = better wave overview)
Lens: Zoom (200–400 mm equiv.) for detail on the model
Frame rate:120 fps minimum (240 fps ideal)
Resolution: 1080p (balance of quality & file size)
Purpose: Measure heave, pitch, roll from a fixed reference frame
Must include in frame:
Wave pole (for wave height & period)
Cup of water (for tilt angle)
Enough of the model for scale reference
Tips:
Lock exposure & white balance (prevents flickering)
Use a spirit level to ensure camera is plumb
Affix a ruler or known-length reference in the frame
Record a 10-second slate at the start (date, test #, conditions)
🎥 GoPro (On-Model POV)
Position: On the model — looking forward, or angled 45° down at the deck & cup
Frame rate:120 fps at 1080p (or 240 fps at 720p)
FOV: Wide orSuperview
Purpose: “First-person” wave experience + accelerometer data
GoPro accelerometer: Export via GoPro Quik app (records g-forces)
Tips:
Waterproof housing essential!
Anti-fog inserts in the housing
Secure firmly — vibration ruins footage
Start recording before launching the model
Consider a second GoPro underwater, looking at the legs
Video Analysis Software
Tracker (free, open-source) — Physics video analysis. Track points frame-by-frame, auto-calculates velocity, acceleration, angles. Set custom scale factors and coordinate systems. ⭐ Best for this application.
Kinovea (free) — Motion analysis; originally for sports biomechanics, excellent for tracking angles and trajectories.
DaVinci Resolve (free) — Professional editor; great for slow-motion rendering and colour grading.
Killer feature:Remote control via web browser — control the phone from a laptop on shore while the phone is on the model! Start/stop recording, view live data, download files, all without touching the model.
💡 Pro Tip: Mount a cheap “burner” phone on the model (waterproof bag or case!). Use phyphox’s remote access from your main phone or laptop on shore. Start logging before launch, stop after recovery. Download CSV data over Wi-Fi. No need to touch the model between runs!
What to Log
Sensor Channel
Measures (Model)
Full-Scale Conversion
Accelerometer X (surge)
Fore–aft acceleration
× 1 (same)
Accelerometer Y (sway)
Port–starboard acceleration
× 1 (same)
Accelerometer Z (heave)
Vertical acceleration
× 1 (same)
Gyroscope (pitch, roll, yaw rates)
Angular velocity in °/s
÷ 3.24
Orientation / rotation vector
Pitch & roll angles in °
× 1 (same)
Barometer
Altitude change (proxy for heave)
× 10.5 for displacement
Magnetometer
Heading / yaw
× 1 (same)
13 Additional Measurement Methods to Consider
Low-Cost / DIY
Reference Grid on Model
Draw or tape a grid on the model floor and walls. The shore camera uses this to precisely measure pitch, roll, and heave from video (especially with Tracker software).
Pendulum Inclinometer
Hang a small weighted string (plumb bob) from a visible point. The pendulum angle directly shows static tilt. Film it from shore. Simple, cheap, and effective.
Coloured Tape Markers
Place bright tape at bow, stern, port, starboard, and centre. Gives Tracker software clear tracking points for measuring 3D motion.
Mooring-Line Force (Fish Scale)
Attach a spring scale or digital fish scale in-line with the tether. Read peak mooring forces. Scale by λ³ = 1,158 for full-scale mooring loads.
Tow Drag Measurement
If you tow the model behind a dinghy at various speeds, a fish scale in the tow line measures drag. Scale force by λ³ and speed by √λ.
Anemometer
A handheld wind meter records wind speed & direction. Aerodynamic loads on the living area become important at higher wind speeds. Record wind for each test run.
Current Float Test
Throw a small float and time its travel over a measured distance to estimate current speed. Current affects mooring loads and wave superposition.
More Advanced Methods
Resistance Wave Probe
Two parallel wires dipped in water — resistance changes with submersion depth. Connect to an Arduino or phone audio input. Gives continuous wave-height time series at the model location. Very inexpensive to build.
Arduino + IMU Data Logger
An Arduino Uno/Nano with an MPU-6050 IMU (< $15 total) logs 6-axis data at 200+ Hz. Higher bandwidth than a phone; can be customised for your experiment.
Load Cells on Leg Attachments
Strain-gauge load cells at the leg-to-hull connections measure individual leg forces. Reveals load distribution and peak loads during wave impacts.
Underwater Camera
A GoPro in its waterproof housing, mounted below the waterline or on a separate pole, can show: leg behaviour in waves, stabiliser operation, flow patterns, and any cavitation on the thrusters.
Pressure Sensors
Small barometric pressure sensors (e.g., BMP280 on Arduino) taped to the hull measure wave-slam pressures at specific locations.
Recommended Test Measurement Checklist
#
Measurement
Method
Priority
1
Wave height at model
Wave pole + shore camera
⭐ Essential
2
Wave period
Wave pole + stopwatch / video
⭐ Essential
3
Water depth at test location
Weighted line / depth sounder
⭐ Essential
4
Heave / surge / sway accelerations
Phone (phyphox) + GoPro
⭐ Essential
5
Pitch & roll angles
Shore camera video + Tracker
⭐ Essential
6
Cup-of-water tilt
Shore camera video
⭐ Essential
7
Wind speed & direction
Handheld anemometer
🔶 Important
8
Mooring-line force
Spring scale / fish scale
🔶 Important
9
First-person POV video
GoPro on model
🔶 Important
10
Free-decay natural periods
Push-and-release + camera
🔶 Important
11
Current speed & direction
Float test / current meter
🔷 Nice to have
12
Water temperature
Thermometer
🔷 Nice to have
13
Bottom profile at test site
Lead line at several spots
🔷 Nice to have
14 Sandy Hill Bay — Test Location Notes
Expected Conditions
Location: East coast of Anguilla, Caribbean — faces east-northeast toward the open Atlantic
Water type: Seawater, salinity ≈ 35 ppt, density ≈ 64.0 lb/ft³ (1,025 kg/m³)
Water temperature: ~80°F (27°C) — comfortable for working
Typical trade-wind waves: 1–3 ft, period 4–6 sec
Atlantic swell penetration: 3–6+ ft, period 8–14 sec (seasonal)
Visibility: Excellent — great for underwater observation
Finding Different Wave Heights
Target (Full Scale)
Model Height Needed
Where / When to Find It
3 ft waves
3.43″
Typical trade-wind chop in exposed parts of the bay — most days
5 ft waves
5.71″
Moderate trade winds (15–20 kt) or when Atlantic swell enters the bay
8 ft waves
9.14″
Strong trades or significant swell event — may need to wait for the right conditions
⚠️ Realistic expectation: Sandy Hill Bay may not produce 9″ model-height (8 ft full-scale) waves frequently. That’s perfectly OK! The 3-foot wave condition (3.43″) is the most likely to be available and is very informative. Test in whatever waves nature provides — document the actual conditions thoroughly.
Suggested Test Procedure
Scout the bay (on foot or by dinghy) to find the deepest, most wave-exposed accessible spot.
Measure depth at the chosen location; map the bottom profile if possible.
Deploy the wave pole near the model position, clearly visible from shore.
Waterproof the phone (dry bag or case), mount on model, start phyphox via remote access.
Start all cameras (shore cam, GoPro). Slate each take with a test number and conditions.
Launch the model; secure with the stretchy tether line held by a person or tied to a mooring.
Record baseline in calm conditions (if available).
Record each wave condition for at least 2–3 minutes of model time (≈ 6–10 min full-scale equivalent).
Log wave heights and periods from the pole. Log wind speed.
Perform free-decay tests between wave runs (heave, roll, pitch).
Retrieve model, check for water intrusion, adjust ballast if needed.
Repeat at different locations in the bay for different wave exposures.
15 Known Limitations of Froude Scaling
Froude scaling is the right tool for this test, but be aware of these caveats when interpreting results:
Effect
Issue at Model Scale
Impact on Your Test
Reynolds number mismatch
Model has much lower Re; viscous drag is relatively larger
Model drag will be proportionally higher than full scale. Motion response (heave/pitch/roll) is mostly unaffected since it’s gravity-driven.
Surface tension
Capillary effects are relatively stronger at small scale
Negligible for model dimensions > ~2″. Your model is large enough that this won’t matter.
Structural elasticity
Model material may be proportionally more or less flexible
Keep the model rigid. Stiffness doesn’t auto-scale.
Aerodynamic drag
Wind loads on the model are proportionally larger relative to wave loads
Test in low-wind conditions if possible, or note wind speed.
Mooring dynamics
Stretchy tether may not perfectly mimic scaled mooring stiffness
Use the softest tether that still keeps the model in position. Measure tether force.
Wave reflection / basin effects
In a bay, waves reflect off shores and interfere
Note any reflected waves; position model away from hard reflecting surfaces.
Bottom line: For wave-induced motion (heave, pitch, roll) and stability assessment, Froude scaling is excellent and your results will be meaningful. For speed / drag predictions, Reynolds number effects make model drag data less directly applicable. The bay test is ideal for validating the motion and stability design.