Here's a complete, ready-to-use HTML file with the table. Note that all figures are best estimates — freight rates fluctuate significantly with market conditions, fuel surcharges, seasonality, and carrier. ```html Container Specifications & Shipping Cost Estimates

Shipping Container Comparison

Specifications & Estimated Freight Costs (Shenzhen, CN origin)

Specification / Estimate Standard 40' Container High Cube 40' Container High Cube 45' Container
Internal Length 39.5 ft 39.6 ft 44.4 ft
Internal Width 7.7 ft 7.7 ft 7.7 ft
Internal Height 7.84 ft 8.86 ft 8.86 ft
Total Cubic Feet ~2,390 cu ft ~2,697 cu ft ~3,037 cu ft
Maximum Payload ~58,900 lbs ~58,600 lbs ~58,300 lbs
Est. Cost: Shenzhen → San Diego $2,400 $2,550 $2,800
Cost per Cubic Foot (San Diego) $1.00 $0.95 $0.92
Est. Cost: Shenzhen → St. Maarten $5,000 $5,300 $5,800
Cost per Cubic Foot (St. Maarten) $2.09 $1.97 $1.91
* All figures are approximate estimates only. Ocean freight rates vary widely based on market conditions, fuel surcharges, seasonality, carrier, and current demand. St. Maarten shipments typically involve transshipment via Caribbean hubs (e.g., Panama, Cartagena, or Florida), which adds cost and transit time. Payload limits may be further constrained by road weight regulations at destination. Obtain quotes from freight forwarders for actual pricing.
``` **Key notes on my estimates:** - **Dimensions** reflect typical ISO specifications; exact figures vary slightly by manufacturer. - **Payload limits** assume standard ISO max gross weight (~67,200 lbs) minus typical tare weights. Road weight limits in California and St. Maarten may reduce usable payload. - **Shenzhen → San Diego**: Based on typical post-pandemic normalized rates for Transpacific West Coast lanes (~$2,400–$2,800 per container). - **Shenzhen → St. Maarten**: Higher due to transshipment requirements through Caribbean hub ports; expect longer transit times (typically 35–50 days vs. ~15–20 days to San Diego). - **Cost efficiency**: Notice the high cube containers offer better cost-per-cubic-foot economics — the 45' HC is the most efficient if your cargo fits and destination infrastructure can handle it. You can copy this directly into an `.html` file or embed the `` section into an existing page. Let me know if you'd like different styling, additional columns (e.g., transit times), or metric units added!