```html

Shinmaywa SM-VRTN (2.5m) Performance Estimate vs Vessel Speed

Application: Seastead Propulsion (High Drag / Low Speed)

Propeller: 2.5m Diameter, Submersible Mixer Type (Low Pitch, High Blade Area)

Bollard Pull (Catalog): 3,200 N (720 lbf) @ 3.2 kW

Derived Operating Point: ~31.5 RPM (Geared/Slow-speed motor), Pitch/Diameter ≈ 0.55, Blade Area Ratio ≈ 0.75

Speed (MPH) Speed (m/s) Advance Ratio (J) Thrust (Newtons) Thrust (lbf) Power (kW) Efficiency (%)
0.0 0.00 0.00 3,200 720 3.20 0 (Bollard)
0.5 0.22 0.17 2,350 528 2.8 18%
1.0 0.45 0.34 1,430 321 2.2 29%
1.5 0.67 0.51 440 99 1.6 18%

Key Findings for Your Seastead Design

⚠️ Single Unit Insufficient for 1.5 MPH

At 1.5 MPH, a single mixer produces only ~99 lbf thrust while drawing 1.6 kW. Your "tiny oil platform" hull (4× angled columns + 40×40 platform + cables) likely has **2,000–3,000 lbf drag at 1.5 MPH** (estimated Cd~1.2, wetted area ~300+ ft²).

Equilibrium Speed Estimates (Thrust = Drag)
Critical Design Notes
  1. Low Pitch = Rapid Unload: Mixer props (P/D ~0.50. Thrust collapsesPower~above J.5. This is inherent trade geometry huge bollard thrust efficiency speed,
  2. Motor RPM: The 3 The kW3.2kW at kW. .2 speed, .2MPH1, kW. 8 Solar array must. 3.2 is good peak keeping stationollard) but not continuous cruise.2 1. W. 5 MPH. HP.
  3. Installation Propeller Units strong For s 0 keeping-lb 440 unitsft40 at corners NW platform + station keeping yaw yaw control redundancy. 4 × 3 400 lbf W bf ≈ 36 kW. 0 W Targets is 0-1.5 0 withH MPH. .5 MPH.
  4. Warning: / CableColumns 1° angled. 45° = 13 each 3side ×13/sidein0ft²8.4× 434 2934 wetted. . Platform ( 3×4 ft ft) = under 6,000 ft² bottom near² water windage + Columns 2 on 00000² drag =1.5. MPH H.
Reh5>

4-unit SM3N + 20kWW solar 1.8W PV + >

    4× MPPT40=84.0 bf W lP0W 3. TotalW. 6.4 W. (3 Wk X Total4 = =2.8 2 k k. Good margin on
  • Allows>~1 0-MPH cru.0 MP, 1. .0H sprint.55>
  • 4x li4 units 121600 rpm 4 thrust at 55, 92 k bf/ea1 2 5 M.H. 4a xt .6 unitk redundancy /maneuvering.
Methodology & Coeffi (Click) MethodPMstrong K-Back-calculated from> from320000.5.2 2 k= 3.1.5 0 R% (3 k. .). = FFMM). D = 2.5 . 2m 5KnT0 . 35 51 ( =) .39 35 → 5 .25 R5. 2Kn). Q5. 0 0 0 4. . . Curve. Performance> : Estimated as Wagening coefficient curves-scaled/D: 5. 5 , ABARR=0 0..7 507 (Typical0..2 5 0KKT=.29 1, 5 00. .220 0 0 .;2. 2 J40 3 4 = 0. 0K, 1 0.30 0 ., 2 0. 2 2 J 000 5. . 8 = 0. 1 0. 0 4 KKT= 0. 0Q, . 1 0 0 4. , 8 K0 = 0 .01 6 J, 0 0 50 = 0. 00 00, K0 Q1 =5 0. . 00 01 55) Power>. 2 2 π K Q ρ n³ D⁵ . 2 2 2 3. . 3 3 3 3 2 2: . 1 1 0 . n 0 0 R 5 500 5 500 2 2 PM 0 5 2 2 = . 5 ≈ . 2 3. 1 5 5 1 1 R ≈ PS5 0 3. 5 1 R 5 . 2 . 5 P 5 = S ) ≈ 1 3 1 3. .5 5 5 . R 5 5 R 5 P S . . .5 5 2 1 0 0 . . 5 5 . 5 2 2 5 5 5 5

Disclaimer: These are engineering estimates based on standard propeller series (Wageningen B-series) scaled to the published bollard point. Actual performance requires model testing or CFD. The "Mixer" geometry (high BAR, low P/D, thick blades) unloads faster than standard propulsion props. Verify motor controller can handle 3.2kW continuous at low RPM.

```