```html Triangular Seastead Scale Model Analysis

Triangular Seastead Scale Model Analysis

1:6 Scale Hydrodynamic Performance & Full-Scale Predictions

Wave Height Analysis

Based on the video footage and relative proportions (comparing wave crests to the 8-inch diameter floats):

Estimated Model Wave Heights: 2 to 4 inches (0.05 - 0.10 m)
Equivalent Full-Scale Wave Heights: 12 to 24 inches (0.3 - 0.6 m)
Note: These represent moderate sea states (Sea State 2-3) at full scale.

The waves in the test represent 1-2 foot seas at full scale—conditions where a 60-foot vessel would normally cruise comfortably but where smaller craft might experience noticeable motion.

Dynamic Characteristics Analysis

Current Configuration (1/3 Submergence)

With the legs only 33% submerged, your model has approximately:

Critical Finding: A 3.5-second heave period is quite short for a 60-foot vessel. This places the natural period near the peak energy of typical coastal wave spectra (4-6 second waves), potentially causing resonance and "hobby-horsing" behavior.

Target Configuration (2/3 Submergence)

With twice the ballast (double displacement, same waterplane):

T_heave = 2π√(m / ρgA)
If m → 2m, then T → T×√2

Comparative Seakeeping Analysis

Parameter Your Seastead (Light) Your Seastead (Ballasted) 50 ft Catamaran 60 ft Monohull
Beam (Width) 60 ft (triangle) 60 ft (triangle) 25-28 ft 16-18 ft
Heave Period 3.5 s 5.0 s 4.5-6.0 s 5.5-7.0 s
Roll Period 6-8 s 8-11 s 8-12 s 10-14 s
Pitch Stiffness Very High (widely spaced columns) Moderate Moderate
Motion Type Heave-dominant, low pitch/roll Heave + Pitch Roll + Pitch

Key Differences:

Acceleration Analysis

Under Froude scaling, accelerations are identical in model and full scale. The video shows the time-scaled motion, so the "feel" of the accelerations you see is representative of full scale.

Current Light Condition Estimates:

a_max ≈ (2π/T)² × z_max
Where T = 3.5s, z_max ≈ 0.3m (1 ft heave in 2 ft waves)
a ≈ 0.97 m/s² ≈ 0.10g average, 0.15-0.20g peaks

Compared to conventional vessels in 2-foot seas:

Sensation: The light configuration likely feels "busier" or more "jiggly" than a heavy boat. The short 3.5-second period means the platform tracks the wave surface closely, creating frequent, short-duration vertical impulses.

Predicted Ballasted Condition:

With 2× Ballast (2/3 submergence):

Physics Explanation: Doubling the mass increases the inertia while keeping the buoyancy spring rate constant. The system becomes more "sluggish"—it takes longer to oscillate, and for the same wave height, the amplitude of motion decreases (inertial filtering), reducing peak accelerations.

Predictions for Your Next Test

When you add ballast to achieve 2/3 submergence, you should observe:

  1. Slower Oscillations: The model will bob up and down roughly 30% slower (period increasing from ~1.4s to ~2.0s in model time).
  2. Reduced "Chatter": High-frequency motion should disappear. The legs will pierce the water surface more deliberately rather than skimming/bouncing.
  3. Deeper Draft Effect: With 32" draft instead of 16", the center of gravity lowers and the waterplane inertia increases, improving stability.
  4. Wave Transparency: In the same wave field, the ballasted model should show smaller heave amplitude relative to wave height—appearing more "planted" in the water.
Success Metric: If your target is ocean livability, the ballasted version should feel similar to a heavy 60-foot trawler yacht—slow, predictable motions with low angular accelerations in roll/pitch, and moderate vertical accelerations in heave.

Recommendations

```