Solar‑Electric Trawler – Active Outrigger Glider Design

This page summarises a quick engineering feasibility study for the proposed “active paravane / flopper‑stopper” system. It answers the questions you asked and gives order‑of‑magnitude numbers, hardware options and a practical test plan.

1. What forces do we need from each glider?

A typical 10‑12 m cruising trawler displaces ≈ 5–10 t. For a roll‑righting moment we can approximate a desired righting torque of about 10 kNm at a 5° heel (a comfortable sea‑state). With outriggers placed ~5 m outboard from the centre‑line, each glider must generate roughly 2 kN of lift (≈ 200 kgf) to cancel the roll moment. In practice you would design for a safety factor of 1.5–2, so target ≈ 3 kN per side.

Target lift per glider ≈ 2 – 3 kN (≈ 200‑300 kgf)

2. How big must the glider be?

Assuming the glider behaves like a simple wing towed at a small angle of attack, the lift equation is:

L = ½ ρ V² A CL

Solving for area A gives:

A ≈ 0.7 – 1.5 m² per glider (for 2–3 kN lift)

That translates to a wing about 1.5 m span × 0.5 m chord. The whole glider (including fuselage, tail and fins) would be roughly the size of a small radio‑controlled model airplane – about 1.2 m long and 1.5 kg in air (≈ 2 kg in water when neutrally buoyant).

Resulting drag

Using a drag coefficient of about 0.1 for a streamlined shape:

D = ½ ρ V² A CD ≈ 160 N per glider.

Total drag for both outriggers ≈ 320 N.

3. Power needed to tow the gliders at 4 kt

Power = drag × velocity:

P ≈ 320 N × 2.06 m/s ≈ 660 W (total for both gliders)

This is the hydrodynamic towing power. The actual power drawn from the boat’s battery will be a bit higher because of losses in the tether cable and actuator efficiency – expect ≈ 0.8 – 1 kW at full corrective force. For a 4‑knot solar‑electric cruiser that is a very small fraction of the available solar‑array power (typically 2–5 kW on a 10‑m boat).

4. Underwater‑rated actuators for the tail fins

You need a compact, sealed actuator that can move a small control surface (the glider’s tail) with a few newton‑metres of torque. Options:

TypeTypical specsSize (mm)Weight (kg)Cost (USD)
Water‑proof RC servo (e.g. KST X12, Blue Robotics “BRS‑500”) Torque 12 kg·cm (≈ 1.2 Nm), 180° travel, 6‑8 V ≈ 40 × 20 × 35 ≈ 0.07 $80 – $150
Sealed brush‑less linear actuator (e.g. Thomson Actuator “Sealed Lead Screw”) Force 150 N, stroke 50 mm, 12‑24 V ≈ 80 × 30 × 30 ≈ 0.4 $200 – $350
Miniature hydraulic cylinder (custom marine‑grade) Up to 500 N, 20‑mm bore, 100 mm stroke ≈ 120 × 25 × 25 ≈ 0.3 (excluding pump) $300 – $500 (pump & control extra)

For a “glider” that will be towed at low speed, a high‑quality waterproof RC servo is the simplest and cheapest solution – you can get models that are rated to 200 m depth. If you need more force (e.g., larger fins) a sealed linear actuator is the next step.

Cable / tether for power + data + strong load

The line that connects the boat to each glider must simultaneously:

A practical “composite tether” can be built like this:

ComponentSpecTypical Cost (per metre)
Strength member braided Kevlar or Spectra, 6 mm Ø, 3 kN breaking load$1‑$2
Power conductors2 × 18 AWG (≈ 1 mm²) – 24 V, 5 A$0.5
Data pair2 × 24 AWG twisted‑pair, shielded$0.3
Outer jacketPolyurethane, 8 mm Ø, UV‑stable, abrasion‑resistant$0.8

Total cost ≈ $3 – $5 per metre. For a 10 m tether (the maximum you would need for a 5 m outrigger reach) that is $30‑$50. You can also buy ready‑made “ROV tethers” (e.g., from Blue Robotics) that include all of the above for about $15‑$20 per metre – a good choice for a prototype.

5. Control system – sensors & software

The control algorithm would look roughly like this:

error = desired_roll - measured_roll
correction = Kp*error + Ki*integral(error) + Kd*(error - prev_error)
target_lift = baseline_lift + correction    // baseline = weight of glider + static lift
tail_angle = map(target_lift, min_lift, max_lift, -15°, +15°)
send_command_to_servo(tail_angle)

You would also incorporate the tension feedback – if the tension drops (glider is being “over‑lifted”) you can reduce the tail angle to avoid excessive drag.

6. Plausibility & next steps

Overall verdict: Yes, the concept is plausible. The required forces, sizes and power draw are modest for a 10‑m solar‑electric trawler. The biggest challenges are:

All of these are engineering problems that have been solved in similar systems (e.g., passive paravanes, ROVs, autonomous underwater gliders).

Recommended prototype test

  1. Buy a small (≈ 1 m) “glider” – e.g., a foam‑wing sailplane or a cheap RC flying wing.
  2. Fit a waterproof servo to the tail and attach a 5‑m tether (the composite cable described above).
  3. Mount a load cell on the tether and an IMU on a small inflatable test boat (or on the parent trawler if you have one).
  4. Run the boat at 3‑5 kt, letting the glider tow behind, and manually command different tail angles to see the resulting lift and drag.
  5. Collect data: lift vs. tail angle, drag vs. speed, tension spikes, etc.
  6. Implement the PID loop on a Raspberry Pi and repeat – you should see a measurable reduction in roll amplitude.

If the test confirms the lift‑versus‑tail‑angle relationship predicted above, you can confidently scale the design up for the final solar‑electric trawler.

7. Quick reference numbers

ParameterValueComment
Target lift per glider2 – 3 kN≈ 200‑300 kgf
Glider wing area0.7 – 1.5 m²≈ 1.5 m span × 0.5 m chord
Glider drag at 4 kt≈ 160 N≈ 16 kgf per glider
Total towing power≈ 0.8 kWIncluding cable losses
Servo torque needed≈ 1 NmTypical waterproof RC servo
Actuator size≈ 40 × 20 × 35 mmRC servo
Actuator cost$80 – $150Each glider
Tether cost (per metre)$3 – $5Composite power+data+strength

8. References & further reading


All numbers above are order‑of‑magnitude estimates. Detailed design should involve CFD / model‑testing and a full safety‑factor analysis. Feel free to adapt the layout for your own site.