```html Seastead 1/6 Scale Model – Design Notes

1/6 Scale Seastead – Design & Testing Notes

This page summarises the Froude‑scaled dimensions, weight, wave‑height targets, sensor options and measurement strategies for a 1/6‑scale model of the proposed 40 ft × 16 ft living‑area seastead.

1. Geometric Scaling (Froude‐相似)

Full‑scale values → model (scale factor λ = 1/6). All linear dimensions are divided by 6. Results are given in inches to match the request.

Full‑scale dimensionScale factorModel dimension (inches)Model dimension (ft‑in)
Living‑area length = 40 ft (480 in)1/6480 ÷ 6 = 80 in6 ft 8 in
Living‑area width = 16 ft (192 in)1/6192 ÷ 6 = 32 in2 ft 8 in
Column length = 24 ft (288 in)1/6288 ÷ 6 = 48 in4 ft 0 in
Column “width” (square cross‑section) = 4 ft (48 in)1/648 ÷ 6 = 8 in0 ft 8 in
Under‑water portion of column (half of 24 ft) = 12 ft (144 in)1/6144 ÷ 6 = 24 in2 ft 0 in

All four columns keep the 45° angle of the full‑scale design – the model’s geometry is a direct miniature.

2. Target Mass (Froude‑weight scaling)

Weight scales with the volume (λ³). Using the same material density as the full‑scale structure:

Model weight = 36 000 lb × (1/6)³ = 36 000 lb ÷ 216 ≈ 166.7 lb

You can aim for ~165‑170 lb. Adjust the internal ballast (e.g., steel plates or sand) to hit this target exactly.

If you use lighter materials (e.g., foam‑core panels) you will need to add extra mass to reach the 166 lb target. The target mass is what gives you correct Froude dynamic similarity.

3. Wave‑Height Scaling

Wave height scales linearly (λ). For the three full‑scale wave heights you mentioned:

Full‑scale wave heightModel wave height (inches)Model wave height (ft‑in)
3 ft3 ft ÷ 6 = 6 in0 ft 6 in
5 ft5 ft ÷ 6 ≈ 10 in0 ft 10 in
8 ft8 ft ÷ 6 ≈ 16 in1 ft 4 in

These are the target heights you should try to generate (or find on the day) at the model’s water line.

4. Cable‑Tension Measurement

4.1 Rubber (surgical) tubing

Typical latex surgical tubing has a fairly low spring constant. In laboratory tests a 5 cm long piece of 2 mm‑ID latex will start to stretch noticeably at ≈0.5–1 lb and will generally fail (rupture) somewhere between 5–10 lb depending on wall thickness. Thicker silicone tubing can go up to ~20 lb but becomes quite stiff.

Because tension scales with λ³ (the same factor as weight), a 1 lb tension in the model corresponds to:

Full‑scale tension ≈ 1 lb × 216 ≈ 216 lb

So a 5 lb max safe load in the model would map to about 1 080 lb full‑scale. For a 36 000 lb seastead the static horizontal component of each column is ~12 700 lb, far larger than 1 080 lb. Consequently, plain rubber tubing would be overloaded in the static case, and would certainly break under any realistic wave loads.

Rubber tubing can only be used as a qualitative indicator of tension changes (e.g., “tension went up by 0.2 lb”). It is not suitable for measuring the full static load.

4.2 Low‑cost waterproof digital rope‑tension loggers

You won’t find a ready‑made “rope‑tension data‑logger” on Amazon, but there are several cheap devices that can be inserted in line with a rope and can log the load.

Search terms that work well on Amazon:

If you only need a quick visual read‑out, a hanging scale placed in line will work; for continuous logging you’ll need the Arduino approach or a “Bluetooth weight scale” that can stream to a phone.

5. Acceleration & Sliding‑Plate Criteria

5.1 Froude‑scaling of acceleration

Under strict Froude similarity, acceleration (in units of g) is the same in model and full‑scale. This is because velocity scales as √λ and time scales as √λ, giving a′ = a. Therefore, the numbers you record on the 1/6 model (in g) can be directly compared to the full‑scale seastead.

5.2 When will a plate start to slide?

The threshold acceleration a_slide is given by

a_slide = μ × g

where μ is the coefficient of static friction between the plate and the surface. Typical values:

Using μ ≈ 0.4 (a safe middle‑ground), the sliding threshold is about 0.4 g ≈ 13 ft/s². If your model experiences accelerations above ~0.3‑0.5 g you can expect plates to move. That same threshold applies to the full‑scale.

5.3 Other useful acceleration metrics

6. Smartphone‑Based Motion Logging

6.1 Recommended Android apps

6.2 Overlaying acceleration on video

No mainstream Android app currently writes sensor data directly into the video file. The typical workflow is:

  1. Start the video recording (using the phone camera or a separate action cam).
  2. Simultaneously start a sensor‑logging app (Phyphox, SensorLog).
  3. After the test, import both the video and the CSV into video‑editing software (e.g., DaVinci Resolve, OpenShot, or even Windows Movie Maker).
  4. Add a text overlay that shows the most relevant values (e.g., “Accel X: 0.12 g, Pitch: 3°”) at each time‑code. You can automate this with a small Python script if you have many runs.

Alternatively, you can use a “screen‑recording” app while the sensor values are displayed on‑screen in a separate app, then capture both the visual data and the video in one file.

6.3 What to log

At a minimum capture:

Set the logging rate to at least 20 Hz (the higher the better for later FFT, but watch battery & storage). Phyphox can go up to 100 Hz on most phones.

7. Visual & Additional Measurement Ideas

8. Testing Setup in Sandy Hill Bay, Anguilla

Because the model is small enough to be handled by two people, you can either:

The location’s natural wave climate will provide the wave heights you wish to test. If the bay’s typical wave heights are lower than your targets, you can place the model in a slightly more exposed spot, or create a small “wave maker” (a weighted board you pull back and release) to generate the desired heights.

Safety first: always keep a safety line attached to the model so it cannot drift away, and be mindful of local currents and boat traffic.

9. Summary Checklist

Good luck with the test! If you need more detailed drawings, CAD files, or help with Arduino code for the load‑cell logger, just let me know.

```