```html
| Parameter | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Installed solar power | 15.0 kWpeak | 838 ft² roof × 18.6 W/ft² ( ≈20% efficiency ) |
| Average daily production (Caribbean, 5.5 PSH) | 82.5 kWh/day | 15 kW × 5.5 h; we use 75 kWh net after small system losses |
| Battery weight (25% of displacement) | 4,500 lbs | LiFePO₄, split among the 3 legs (wide distribution for roll inertia) |
| Battery energy capacity | ≈245 kWh | 120 Wh/kg ≈ 54.5 Wh/lb |
| Battery cost (@ $90/kWh) | $22,050 | Large‑format prismatic cells, marine grade BMS |
| Continuous power if daily solar used evenly over 24 h | 3,125 W | 75,000 Wh ÷ 24 h |
The battery is sized to absorb one full day of solar output, providing overnight & emergency endurance.
Seastead points into wind; effective aerodynamic drag area (CDA) = 231 ft² (triangle wall 308 ft² × CD 0.7 + 3 legs × 18.5 ft² × CD 0.1 + walkway/railing ≈10 ft²).
| Wind Speed (mph) | Wind Force (lbs) | Required Thruster Electrical Power (W)* |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 237 | 1,660 |
| 30 | 533 | 3,730 |
| 40 | 947 | 6,630 |
| 50 | 1,479 | 10,350 |
* Assumes static thrust power factor 7 W/lb thrust; total installed thruster capacity 6 × 5 kW = 30 kW provides ample margin.
| Load | Average Power (W) | Daily Energy (kWh) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 water makers (30 gal/day total) | 80 | 1.9 |
| Air conditioning (1 × 5 kBTU, 30% duty) | 170 | 4.1 |
| DC refrigerator | 100 | 2.4 |
| 2 Starlink terminals | 50 | 1.2 |
| LED lighting, electronics, pumps | 200 | 4.8 |
| Electric incinerating toilet | 40 | 1.0 |
| Misc/ventilation | 90 | 2.2 |
| Total house load | 730 W | 17.5 kWh/day |
| Average total solar available (24 h) | 3,125 W | 75.0 kWh/day |
| Surplus for propulsion | 2,395 W | 57.5 kWh/day |
Surplus is about 77 % of total solar production and 328 % of house consumption.
Battery capacity 245 kWh; daily solar for propulsion = 57.5 kWh → average 2,396 W continuously. Propulsive efficiency assumed 45 % (motor+controller+prop). Air drag for 20 mph headwind included in headwind cases. Stabiliser “on” = deployed with added wetted area & induced drag; “off” = faired/minimal drag.
| Speed (kn) | Total Drag (lbs) | Elec. Power (W) | Battery Only Hours / Range (mi) | Solar + Battery Hours / Range (mi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 22.5 | 342 | 716 h / 2,470 mi | Unlimited* |
| 4 | 39.9 | 812 | 302 h / 1,388 mi | Unlimited* |
| 5 | 62.4 | 1,585 | 155 h / 889 mi | Unlimited* |
| 6 | 89.8 | 2,739 | 89 h / 618 mi | 715 h / 4,940 mi |
| 7 | 122.2 | 4,350 | 56 h / 454 mi | 125 h / 1,008 mi |
*Power ≤ 2,396 W → net positive energy, range only limited by provisioning.
| Speed (kn) | Total Drag (lbs) | Elec. Power (W) | Battery Only Hours / Range (mi) | Solar + Battery Hours / Range (mi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 35.2 | 536 | 457 h / 1,577 mi | Unlimited* |
| 4 | 62.5 | 1,271 | 193 h / 887 mi | Unlimited* |
| 5 | 97.7 | 2,482 | 99 h / 568 mi | 2,847 h / 16,370 mi |
| 6 | 140.6 | 4,290 | 57 h / 395 mi | 130 h / 896 mi |
| 7 | 191.4 | 6,812 | 36 h / 290 mi | 56 h / 452 mi |
| Speed (kn) | Total Drag (lbs) | Elec. Power (W) | Battery Only Hours / Range (mi) | Solar + Battery Hours / Range (mi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 348.2 | 5,312 | 46 h / 159 mi | 84 h / 290 mi |
| 4 | 398.2 | 8,100 | 30 h / 139 mi | 45 h / 206 mi |
| 5 | 455.2 | 11,574 | 21 h / 122 mi | 28 h / 161 mi |
| 6 | 518.4 | 15,820 | 15.5 h / 107 mi | 19 h / 134 mi |
| 7 | 588.2 | 20,940 | 11.7 h / 94 mi | 14 h / 111 mi |
| Speed (kn) | Total Drag (lbs) | Elec. Power (W) | Battery Only Hours / Range (mi) | Solar + Battery Hours / Range (mi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 360.9 | 5,506 | 44.5 h / 153 mi | 81 h / 279 mi |
| 4 | 420.8 | 8,560 | 28.6 h / 131 mi | 43 h / 196 mi |
| 5 | 490.5 | 12,470 | 19.6 h / 113 mi | 26 h / 150 mi |
| 6 | 569.2 | 17,370 | 14.1 h / 97 mi | 17 h / 121 mi |
| 7 | 657.4 | 23,400 | 10.5 h / 84 mi | 12 h / 100 mi |
Average continuous cruising speed (24 h/day) on surplus solar:
≈ 5.7 kn (6.6 mph) with stabilisers off, ≈ 4.9 kn (5.6 mph) with stabilisers on. Headwinds reduce these.
All estimates in 2025 USD, Chinese manufacturing base.
| # | Item | Weight (lbs) | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 legs (foil‑shaped aluminium hulls with ladders) | 1,500 | 15,000 |
| 2 | Body (triangle frame, walls, roof, floor, interior walls, walkways, rear deck) | 3,500 | 40,000 |
| 3 | Solar panels (15 kW, lightweight marine) | 1,200 | 7,500 |
| 4 | 6 Rim‑drive thrusters (1.5 ft Ø, 5 kW each) | 180 | 12,000 |
| 5 | MPPT charge controllers (3 units) | 50 | 1,500 |
| 6 | LiFePO₄ batteries (245 kWh total) | 4,500 | 22,050 |
| 7 | Inverters (3 × 5 kW, triple‑redundant) | 90 | 3,000 |
| 8 | 2 water makers + fresh water storage | 130 | 4,500 |
| 9 | Air conditioning (3 × 5 kBTU, only 1 at a time) | 150 | 6,000 |
| 10 | Insulation (spray foam, reflecting films) | 100 | 2,000 |
| 11 | Flooring, cabinets, kitchen, furniture, bathroom, bedroom | 800 | 15,000 |
| 12 | Waste / holding tank | 30 | 500 |
| 13 | Glass & glass doors (3 corners) | 200 | 5,000 |
| 14 | Refrigerator (DC) | 80 | 1,500 |
| 15 | Davit / crane / winch for dinghy | 100 | 3,000 |
| 16 | Safety equipment (EPIRB, liferaft, harnesses, etc.) | 50 | 2,000 |
| 17 | Dinghy (14 ft RIB + Yamaha HARMO electric OB) | 300 | 8,000 |
| 18 | 2 sea anchors | 40 | 500 |
| 19 | Kite propulsion (20 stackable 6 ft kites + control) | 50 | 2,000 |
| 20 | 8 air bags per leg (emergency buoyancy) | 40 | 1,000 |
| 21 | 2 Starlink terminals + hardware | 30 | 1,000 |
| 22 | Trash compactor | 30 | 500 |
| 23 | 3 aluminium airplane stabilisers with servo‑tab actuators | 300 | 15,000 |
| 24 | Electric incinerating toilet | 40 | 2,000 |
| 25 | Other (wiring, plumbing, navigation lights, helm controls, tools, spares) | 200 | 10,000 |
| Totals | 13,690 lbs | ≈ $190,000 |
Add 10 % contingency → ≈ $210,000 for first prototype.
Ordering 20 units could reduce unit cost to ~$160,000 thanks to scale and tooling.
Total weight 13,690 lbs leaves about 4,300 lbs of surplus buoyancy (total displacement 18,000 lbs) for crew, provisions, water, personal belongings and future additions.
Waterplane area: 3 legs × 13 ft² = 39 ft². Wide leg spacing (≈44 ft beam) gives GM ≈ 44 ft. Mass moment of inertia ≈ 51,000 slug·ft².
The very short roll/pitch periods mean the seastead follows the wave slope quickly; the small waterplane limits excitation, but accelerations can be noticeable. Active stabilisers dramatically increase effective damping.
Typical conditions; values are for the living‑area centroid. “Tip diff.” = height difference between front and back of the 44‑ft living area.
| Wave H / T | Encounter | Stabiliser | Tip Difference (ft) | Vertical Accel. (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 ft, 3 s | Head | OFF | 0.4 – 0.7 | 0.15 – 0.25 |
| ON | 0.1 – 0.3 | 0.05 – 0.12 | ||
| 3 ft, 3 s | Beam | OFF | 0.5 – 0.8 | 0.20 – 0.30 |
| ON | 0.2 – 0.4 | 0.08 – 0.15 | ||
| 5 ft, 5 s | Head | OFF | 0.8 – 1.3 | 0.20 – 0.35 |
| ON | 0.3 – 0.6 | 0.08 – 0.18 | ||
| 5 ft, 5 s | Beam | OFF | 1.0 – 1.5 | 0.25 – 0.40 |
| ON | 0.4 – 0.8 | 0.10 – 0.20 | ||
| 7 ft, 7 s | Head | OFF | 1.5 – 2.5 | 0.30 – 0.50 |
| ON | 0.5 – 1.0 | 0.12 – 0.25 | ||
| 7 ft, 7 s | Beam | OFF | 2.0 – 3.0 | 0.40 – 0.60 |
| ON | 0.7 – 1.2 | 0.15 – 0.30 |
These are rough first‑order estimates. Active stabilisers (servo‑tab) are expected to cut pitch/roll amplitudes by 50‑70 % and greatly reduce peak accelerations.
Inside square footage ≈ 805 ft² is comparable to a 45 ‑ 50 ft production catamaran (e.g., Lagoon 46 or similar). A new 50‑ft catamaran from a major builder retails for $800,000 – $1,200,000, about 5‑6 times the estimated first‑unit cost of this seastead.
Will this seastead pitch/roll less than a 100 ft catamaran in 7‑ft waves?
No – a 100‑ft cat has much longer natural periods (typically 5‑8 s) and far greater mass, leading to gentler motions.
However, the active stabilisers and the small waterplane area of this design mean that peak accelerations are still manageable and can be comparable to a well‑stabilised 50‑ft vessel.
In flag‑of‑convenience countries (Panama, Liberia, Marshall Islands) this vessel can be registered as a trimaran motor‑yacht with a simple survey. The unique shape does not exclude it; small‑waterplane‑area (SWATH‑like) craft are routinely registered under yacht regulations.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Estimated cost (first unit) | ≈ $210,000 |
| Estimated cost (20‑unit production run) | ≈ $160,000 each |
| Average solar produced per day | 75.0 kWh |
| Average house load | 17.5 kWh/day (730 W continuous) |
| Average surplus for propulsion | 57.5 kWh/day (2.40 kW continuous) |
| Reserve buoyancy for crew & personal gear | ≈ 4,300 lbs |
| Average 24/7 cruising speed (Caribbean, solar only) | 5.6 ‑ 6.6 mph (4.9 ‑ 5.7 kn) |
All figures are engineering estimates; actual values will depend on final construction details and sea conditions.