1. Speed Estimation with 3x Yamaha Harmo Motors
Thrust Analysis
Total Static Thrust: 3 × 227 lbs = 681 lbs (≈3,030 N)
Seastead Weight: 30,000 lbs (≈13,600 kg)
Drag Estimation for Platform-Style Hull
Your seastead has significantly higher drag than a displacement hull due to:
- 40' × 40' platform with bluff body characteristics
- 4 angled columns (4 ft diameter at 45°) creating substantial form drag
- Cables and structural elements
- No streamlined hull shape
Rough Drag Calculation:
For a platform structure, drag coefficient Cd ≈ 1.0-1.3 (vs 0.03-0.08 for boats)
Assuming:
- Submerged frontal area: ~150-200 sq ft (columns + structure)
- Drag = 0.5 × ρ × v² × Cd × A
- Water density ρ = 1025 kg/m³
At 0.5 mph (0.22 m/s):
Drag ≈ 0.5 × 1025 × (0.22)² × 1.2 × 18 m² ≈ 550 N
At 1.0 mph (0.45 m/s):
Drag ≈ 0.5 × 1025 × (0.45)² × 1.2 × 18 m² ≈ 2,240 N
Expected Speed Range: With 3,030 N of thrust available, you should achieve 0.8-1.2 mph in calm conditions. Your estimate of 0.5 mph is conservative and realistic, especially accounting for any wind or current.
Wind Resistance: At even 10 knots of headwind, the wind drag on a 40'×40' platform could easily equal or exceed your total thrust. This system is for calm weather emergencies only.
2. Yamaha Harmo Efficiency Assessment
Thrust-to-Power Ratio Comparison
| Motor |
Power (kW) |
Static Thrust (lbs) |
lbs/kW |
Notes |
| Yamaha Harmo |
3.7 |
227 |
61.4 |
Rim drive, ducted prop |
| Torqeedo Cruise 4.0 |
4.0 |
~200 |
50.0 |
Standard electric outboard |
| ePropulsion Spirit 1.0 |
3.0 |
~150 |
50.0 |
Compact design |
| Elco 10HP |
7.5 |
~350 |
46.7 |
Larger motor |
Verdict: The Yamaha Harmo's 61.4 lbs/kW is indeed excellent for static thrust. The rim-drive ducted design is very efficient at low speeds. This is a good choice for your application.
Other highly efficient options to consider:
- Thrustmaster Tunnel Thrusters (70-80 lbs/kW) - but designed for through-hull installation
- Submersible pod drives like Sleipner/Side-Power - but not portable
7. Final Assessment
✓ Your Plan is Sound For Its Intended Purpose
The concept of using a dinghy as an emergency tug is creative and has merit, especially because:
- The dinghy maintains proper propeller depth in waves (your key insight)
- 700 lbs thrust can move your seastead at useful speeds in calm conditions
- Yamaha Harmo motors are efficient and appropriate for this application
- Dual-purpose design (transport + emergency propulsion) is cost-effective
- Remote operation from seastead is technically feasible
⚠ Critical Limitations to Accept:
- Fair weather only: This is not a storm propulsion system
- Slow speed: 0.5-1.2 mph maximum - for repositioning, not travel
- Transom loading: Need engineering verification for 3-motor installation
- 3-motor control: May need to operate as 2+1 rather than synchronized trio
- Complexity: Umbilical cable management is non-trivial
Priority Recommendations:
- Contact Yamaha directly: Discuss 3-motor setup and extended NMEA2000 configuration
- Engineer the transom: Get structural analysis before purchasing dinghy
- Consider 2-motor system: 454 lbs thrust (2× Harmo) might be adequate and simpler
- Budget for Western dinghy: $3,500-5,000 for quality that matches your Harmo investment
- Plan B: Also keep kedge anchor and 500ft of rode as alternative emergency positioning method
Estimated Total Cost:
- 3× Yamaha Harmo 3.7kW: $9,000-12,000
- Quality PE/composite dinghy: $3,500-5,000
- Transom reinforcement/mounting: $500-1,000
- Control system extension: $800-1,500
- Power umbilical and connections: $600-1,000
- Total: $14,400-20,500 USD
Bottom Line: This is a well-reasoned emergency backup system with appropriate expectations. Your insight about keeping motors at consistent water level via the dinghy is excellent engineering thinking. Proceed with careful attention to transom structural requirements and control system integration.